*Last updated 8.03.22
Below is a partial list of fall semester Expos 20 courses. New courses will be added through mid-August, so please return to browse some more.
Sections 210, 211
When George Orwell wrote 1984, the year that gave the book its title and setting lay 35 years ahead. Today, it is more than 35 years in the past, and yet Orwell’s prophecies are as relevant as ever. 1984 has surged to the top of the best-sellers chart three times in the last decade, always at moments when Orwell’s fiction and our reality seemed eerily similar: in 2013, after Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA’s secret mass surveillance program; in 2017, when a Trump spokesperson debuted the concept of “alternative facts” to an incredulous public; and in 2021, following the insurrection at the US Capitol and then-President Trump’s suspension from Facebook and Twitter. Even if you’ve never read the book yourself, you’ve probably heard – maybe even used – some of its iconic phrases: Big Brother, Thought Police, doublethink, thoughtcrime, Newspeak, or 2+2=5. Orwell invented all of this because he wanted to give his readers a handle on what was happening in the world. Much has changed since then, including the fall of the totalitarian regimes that inspired the novel, and yet it seems we still cannot put Orwell’s premonitions behind us.
In this course, we examine the enduring significance of 1984 from three different angles. In the first unit, we’ll grapple with the text itself, close-reading key passages from the novel and using them to explore the underappreciated nuances of Orwell’s masterpiece. In the second unit, we’ll consider the text in its historical context, drawing evidence from Orwell’s non-fiction writing to add depth and sophistication to our analysis. In the third unit, we’ll consider whether and how Orwell’s novel illuminates our future. You’ll have the opportunity to pursue independent research on key Orwellian themes such as authoritarianism, post-truth, censorship, and surveillance, in order to see how the arguments of contemporary scholars and thought leaders have updated Orwell’s insights for the twenty-first century.
Money is famously difficult to talk about: too awkward, too divisive, too complicated, too abstract, too personal. In this course, we look at how contemporary American writers, philosophers and filmmakers have chosen to talk about money, and how these conversations involve questions of class, justice, work, race and gender. In the first unit of the course, students will watch the 2015 film The Big Short and read a sociological analysis of Wall Street culture in order to explore how the film portrays the values and practices of the financial industry. Unit Two focuses on arguments made by contemporary philosophers and journalists about how individuals and governments should spend their money in order to reflect their values and create a just and healthy world: readings will include Ta-Nehisi Coates’s article “The Case for Reparations”, Silvia Federici’s manifesto “Wages Against Housework” and excerpts from Michael Sandel’s What Money Can’t Buy. We will ask questions such as: What is money? How do we decide what monetary value to place upon love, or a nation’s racist history, or body parts—and is there anything that should not have a price put on it? How does money interact with race, class and gender in the United States, and how does it mediate our personal relationships? The final unit of the course presents students with a selection of recent films that raise questions about the relationship between money, work and gender. Focusing on one of the suggested films, students will undertake their own research to make an original argument in conversation with the work of other scholars.
Animals and Politics
This is an Engaged Scholarship Course.
Nonhuman animals play a major role in the lives of human animals. Yet, their contribution and impact is often ignored or understudied due to anthropocentric norms that are embedded in human systems and institutions. This course is an introduction to animals and politics through an interdisciplinary lens, drawing on political science, psychology, philosophy, sociology, and environmental science. In the course, we ask several questions. Why should humans care about animals and their wellbeing? How are (prejudicial) attitudes toward animals related to prejudicial attitudes toward humans (racism, sexism, homophobia…etc.,)? What is animal agriculture’s impact on the environment, and why have politicians failed to put this issue on the agenda? How is our relationship to animals central to understanding the causes and likelihood of pandemics like COVID-19? Is there an alternative to anthropocentrism in politics and society? In Unit 1, we begin by thinking through several prominent theorists’ arguments about how and when humans should care about the wellbeing of animals. Should animals have rights? In this unit, you will also have a chance to interview friends and family members to gain an understanding of different perspectives on this question in your immediate and nearest ‘community.’ In the next unit, we turn our attention to four different areas that intersect with animals: the environment, health and pandemics, prejudicial attitudes (racism, sexism, homophobia…etc.,), and political candidate evaluations. Students will have the opportunity to write an original research paper based on their own interests. Since even most disciplines and subfields are anthropocentric, there are many research questions that might benefit from ‘bringing the animal in.’ The semester will wrap up with a team-based capstone project that is presented to our community partner for the course. Based on your individual work in your research papers, the capstone project asks you to synthesize that work (within your team) to unlock your team’s message to the world within a medium that YOU define (poster, art, social movement, website…etc.,). What do you want the world to know about the collective research your team has done? You will also write a blog (500 words or 1000 words depending on whether you opt to write this as a team or individually) that you will pitch to an online journal or informational website of your choice.
Are Prisons Obsolete?
Sections 246, 247
This is an Engaged Scholarship Course.
With 1.8 million Americans currently locked behind bars, the United States imprisons its citizens at a higher rate than any other country in the world. But calls to reimagine our country’s carceral system are on the rise. Black Lives Matter and other movements are asking urgent questions: why are Black Americans imprisoned five times more than white ones? Should there be for-profit prisons? What crimes merit confinement? What is the purpose of prisons? And do we even need them? In this course, we will grapple with these questions by examining a variety of scholarly perspectives on the United States prison system. We will begin by analyzing the arguments for prison abolition versus reform in Angela Davis’s Are Prisons Obsolete? (2003). To situate ourselves within a broad debate over the history of mass incarceration in the United States, we will then compare recent scholarship on the subject by Michelle Alexander, James Forman Jr., and Elizabeth Hinton. We will also read first-hand accounts of prisons in Reginald Dwayne Betts’s memoir and poetry. Over the course of the semester, we will receive visits from prison abolitionists, civil rights attorneys, and formerly incarcerated people, who will help us understand the movement to end mass incarceration in the United States.
The Art of the Con
Sections 241, 242
Scammers, flimflammers, snake oil salesmen: no matter what you call them, con artists have long haunted the American imagination––from the pages of The Great Gatsby to the boardrooms of Silicon Valley. And with good reason. “The con,” writes critic and journalist Jia Tolentino, “is in the DNA of this country.” In this course, we will study con artists both real and invented, exploring what these larger-than-life characters––and our culture’s boundless fascination with them––reveal about American notions of ambition, opportunity, and success. In unit one, we will begin by familiarizing ourselves with some of the ways that contemporary writers and thinkers have tried to define the con artist, and then apply these ideas to the story of Anna Delvey––a self-styled “wealthy German heiress” who spent her early twenties defrauding a series of banks, hotels, and wealthy New York acquaintances with little more than empty IOUs. Next, we will consider the role of the con artist in popular media, both as a literary archetype and a target of cultural commentary. Texts will include Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr. Ripley, its film adaptation, and coverage of the now-infamous Fyre Festival from Hulu, Netflix, and Vanity Fair. Finally, in unit three, students will research a con or a popular portrayal of a con of their choosing and make an argument about what it reveals about one or more facets of American life.
Austen & Us
Section 272, 273
In this class, we’ll look at the work of Jane Austen and its afterlives. Relatively obscure in her lifetime, Austen wrote about a narrow subject: marriage and manners in provincial England at the turn of the nineteenth century. Two hundred years after her death, however, Austen’s novels are read and discussed by millions across the globe, adapted for film and television, and obsessed over by fans. Though much has changed since Austen’s time, her work remains relevant: we reimagine her stories in present-day settings and debate whether she was a radical or a conservative, a champion of feminism or a defender of patriarchy, a critic of colonialism or an apologist for empire. Why does Austen still speak to us? What makes her work endure, and what happens when we adapt it? What can her novels tell us about the issues—such as inequality and gender—that shape our world?
We’ll explore these questions while reading and writing about literature, film, and criticism. We’ll begin with one of Austen’s masterpieces, Emma, a brilliant comedy of misunderstandings that features some of Austen’s most interesting uses of irony and perspective and asks fundamental questions about love, class, and women’s roles. Next, we’ll turn to two contemporary adaptations of Emma—1995’s Clueless, which transplants Austen’s novel to Beverly Hills, and 2020’s stylish Emma—to think about how filmmakers transform literature into a visual medium and adjust their source material for a modern audience. To conclude, you’ll have the chance to identify an Austen-related topic that interests you and explore it in a research essay.
Sections 232, 233
Biology traditionally has encompassed the study of organisms and living systems, and as evidenced by the myriad tomes, articles, and symposia devoted to subjects as diverse as microbiology, physiology, and genetics, our knowledge of these and other areas is vast. However, some have predicted that the emerging field of synthetic biology will require us to develop new ways of thinking about, researching, and regulating the science of life. With synthetic biology, a field that uses approaches from genetic, molecular, and computer engineering to construct and redesign “biological parts, devices, and systems,” scientists not only can—but have—reconfigured existing biological components for specific purposes. Currently, for example, researchers are able to create synthetic proteins that destroy cancer cells, are able to extract portions of DNA to provide diagnostics for Zika and Ebola, and are able to engineer microbes to create fuel. One scientist has suggested as a motto for this new field: “Life is what we make it.”
But while the potential benefits of synthetic biology are impressive, the field unsurprisingly has attracted controversy. For our first essay unit, we will explore the claim that scientists are desecrating the “natural,” and we will use the following sources to guide our discussion: “The Case Against Perfection” by political philosopher Michael Sandel, “A Bias for the Natural?” by psychologists Kristi Lockhart, Frank C. Keil, and Justine Aw, and "Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?" by Timothy F. Murphy, whose research focuses on bioethics. For the second essay unit, we will examine scientists’ efforts to resurrect extinct species, a subject that helps us think through the broader critique that synthetic biology is diverting resources from more pressing areas of research. We will draw from a range of sources: The Rise of the Necrofauna by science writer Britt Wray, Nature’s Ghosts by historian Mark Barrow, and De-Extinction and the Genomics Revolution: Life on Demand by Amy Lynn Fletcher, whose most recent research focuses on biotechnology. For the third and final unit, students will devise a research project about the ethics of synthetic biology and will deliver a short presentation about their research to the class.
Family Trees and Family Sagas
Sections 226, 227
In the age of Ancestry.com and 23andMe, we all have instant access to a wealth of information about our family histories. Census data, birth and death records, and other sources essential to genealogical research have become vastly more accessible. At the same time, genetic testing has opened up a radically new way to learn about our past—though scientists are still debating what exactly DNA evidence can tell us about our distant forebears. Yet all this information newly at our fingertips means little until shaped into a story of some kind. So how do the facts of ancestry combine with the art of narrative? How do stories about our ancestors affect our sense of who we are as individuals? What happens when new knowledge about our ancestry disrupts the story we had previously told ourselves? And how do family histories intertwine with the great events of History itself, with wars and revolutions, religious persecutions, mass migrations, and legacies of enslavement and colonization?
This course is about ancestral stories, and how those stories contribute to our sense of self. We begin by interpreting a classic example of family history raised to the level of art: The Saga of the People of Laxardal, one of the so-called “family sagas” composed by Viking Age Icelanders. In our second unit, we change focus to our contemporary moment, and the ways in which family history, genealogy, and genetic ancestry tests are shifting the ways people think about identity. Readings will include an episode of the PBS series Finding Your Roots, hosted by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., and recent articles from sociology and cultural studies on the contemporary phenomena of ancestry tests and “genealogy TV.” Finally, in the third unit, students choose a modern “family saga”— a movie, TV series, work of fiction or memoir——and craft an argument about what that work reveals about the significance of family stories in contemporary society.
Sections 228, 229
Would a real friend help you hide a body? Is our tendency to trust our friends based on good evidence that they are trustworthy or are we just taking a leap of faith? What makes someone a friend in the first place? Philosophers since Aristotle (circa 384-322 B.C.E.) have been wrestling with these questions and in doing so, they have added crucial details, distinctions and depth to our understanding of friendship. In this class, we will join this conversation by considering several key claims that philosophers have made about friendship. We will begin our journey by studying Aristotle’s foundational question of what makes someone a friend. Next, we will visit early modern Europe to investigate the bright side of friendship by considering philosophers Mary Astell (circa 1666-1731) and Michel Montaigne’s (circa 1533-1592) views. In the final unit of the course, we will consider the dark side of friendship as we research contemporary issues about the dangers of friendship. Students will have the opportunity to choose their own cases as they attempt to answer whether friendship can be harmful.
From Homer to Jay-Z: Craft and Complexity in Verbal Art and Oral Traditions
Sections 201, 202
From ancient Greece to modern rap battles, we have gathered to hear and create stories that reflect the way we define ourselves and our communities. What accounts for the persistence – and complexity – of the oral tradition? How are the performances of artists such as Homer and Jay-Z uniquely characterized through the verbal art form? In this course we will attempt to answer these questions by studying oral storytelling in ancient and modern contexts. In Unit I, we will look at historically oral traditions and delve into the paradox of studying verbal art that has been passed down to us through written texts and material effects? We will study one of the oldest and most famous of oral epics - Homer’s Iliad - along with ancient Greek artifacts at the Harvard Art Museum and Boston Museum of Fine Arts. In Unit II, we shall ask what correctly categorizes something as verbal art. We will apply theories of oral epic to more recent verbal traditions by listening to the freestyle rap of Eminem, and watching performances of TikTok artist, Ayanna Albertson. Finally, in our third unit, we will take a step back to consider how oral tradition functions in opposition or subversion to dominant culture by researching different contemporary sources. We will consider the modern podcast as exemplified by ‘The Joe Rogan Experience,’ multimedia exhibits in museums such as Harvard’s Peabody, and BiPOC rap artists such as Tupac and Nicki Minaj, among other subjects. Throughout the course, we will consider together what orality and verbal art communicate that writing cannot, what we mean by “literacy,” and if we can ever even clearly distinguish the “oral” from the “written.”
Gender & Mental Health
This course will consider the complex questions that emerge where gender and mental health meet. We will take an interdisciplinary approach to tackling these questions, drawing on work in clinical psychology, social theory, feminist and historical analyses of clinical science, and primary source historical documents. After developing a foundational understanding of the constructs of gender and mental health, we will consider their intersection, asking how gender leads to illness. We will read and evaluate competing theories about the relative import of biological sex differences; gender norms and socialization; gender-based inequities, stressors, and trauma; and over-pathologizing women and gender-expansive individuals. In the second unit, we will investigate clinicians’ past and current methods of assessing patient distress and impairment and explaining how that distress or impairment developed and what maintains it. To inform our investigation, we will pair historical records of female patients who reported abuse, focusing on Freud’s case studies of hysteria, with more current theoretical frameworks for understanding similar symptoms and experiences. Throughout this unit, we will think about how our ideas about assessment, patient credibility, clinician expertise, and case conceptualization have endured or evolved since the establishment of the field of psychology. We will end by asking what history can teach us about conducting clinical science in a patriarchal but post-binary world. We will consider, for example, how historical treatment of women’s trauma informs the #MeToo movement and how clinical science and practice might adjust to better study and serve gender-expansive individuals.
Horror, madness, monstrosity, death, disease, terror, evil, and weird sexuality": these preoccupations, according to a recent critic, have animated the Gothic genre ever since it emerged in the mid-1700s. We will contemplate these preoccupations as we examine a range of Gothic texts, from eighteenth-century Gothic fragments to stories by Edgar Allan Poe and Isabel Allende. And we will ask these questions about those texts: What makes the Gothic “Gothic”? How are we to understand its recurring motifs--its crumbling old houses, fragmented texts, prematurely buried women, incestuous siblings, and mad narrators? And what have modern Gothic writers and readers made of the genre they’ve inherited? We’ll develop a working definition of the Gothic in our first segment, which will take a group of short stories, from various centuries and countries, as its primary texts. Next, we’ll consider several of Edgar Allan Poe’s stories (including “The Fall of the House of Usher,” “The Tell-Tale Heart,” “The Cask of Amontillado,” and “Ligeia”) in relation to each other and in the context of what a handful of critics have argued about them. Our third segment will focus on “the new Gothic”: your final project, a research essay, will require you to identify a modern Gothic work in any medium—the possibilities include fiction, film, television, music, and visual media--and to develop your own argument about it in the context of contemporary critics’ ideas.
Immigration and Incarceration
Sections 236, 237
The course aims to answer a series of questions fundamental to an understanding of the nation: What role have the fences and bars of carceral facilities—including jails, prisons, detention centers, and concentration camps—played in American immigration? Furthermore, what role do such places play in the stories Americans tell themselves about immigration? This course examines both the historical and contemporary significance of migrant incarceration, broadly construed, in the U.S.: from the ‘processing’ and interrogation of new migrants at Ellis Island and Angel Island to forced encampment of primarily Japanese Americans during World War II to the present-day detention of undocumented migrants and asylum-seekers. Throughout the course, students will consider larger questions about American immigration and traditions of incarceration: In speaking about these subjects, how, and why, do words matter? How does one shed light on experiences and spaces that are intentionally obscured? And finally, is the incarceration of migrants in America an exceptional practice, or is it the norm? In responding to these questions, we will look at a variety of representations, from poetry to the graphic memoirs of Miné Okubo and George Takei to the federally-impounded photography of Dorothea Lange and ethnographic observations of contemporary detention.
Is It O.K. To Be A Luddite?
Sections 260, 261
“Is it o.k. to be a luddite?” This is the question that writer Thomas Pynchon asks us in a 1984 essay of the same name. “And come to think of it, what is a Luddite, anyway?”
The Oxford English Dictionary tells us that the word has at least two meanings:
1. A member of an organized band of English mechanics and their friends, who (1811–16) set themselves to destroy manufacturing machinery in the midlands and north of England.
2. One who opposes the introduction of new technology, esp. into a place of work.
As the second definition suggests but doesn’t outright say, “luddite” is typically an uncomplimentary term for someone who is suspicious of technology and, by extension, progress. This course will ask us to really consider the question Pynchon poses: is it okay to resist (or outright reject) technology? And what would it mean for us to do so?
We will approach these questions (and many more!) from the perspective of cultural analysis, looking at how literature, film, and visual media reflect humanity’s ongoing relationship with—and struggles against—technology. We will read and write about world-altering technologies that are difficult to ignore, but we will also explore the quotidian, the utopian, the obsolete, and the downright absurd—from Google Earth and cloud seeding to VHS tapes and big balls of garbage—all the while looking for ways to understand technologies through the stories we tell about them.
More Than a Game
Sections 221, 222
“Shut up and dribble,” snarled a broadcaster when basketball star LeBron James voiced concerns about the competence of then-President Trump in 2018. The message was clear: sports and politics don’t mix. In fact, as we will find across various media this semester, few things in the past century have been as closely intertwined. At the same time, the relationship often appears lopsided. Politicians show little hesitation to wade into issues pertaining to athletics, but athletes—like LeBron James himself—are discouraged from anything resembling an opinion on matters with a wider societal bearing. Through units navigating the NFL’s suppression of concussion science, the complex relationship of race to American sports culture, and the political dynamics of consequential events within the sporting world, we will consider the following questions: what makes the world of sports such a significant setting for political activism? What authority lies in the manipulation of athletic culture by politicians? In what ways do athletes become avatars of their cultural moment, and can they ever really exist “above the fray”?
Personhood in U.S. Constitutional Law
Sections 219, 220
According to philosopher Thomas Hobbes, the world—including human selfishness—is violent, immoral, and ultimately unjust. Therefore, societies establish supreme laws to uphold contracts, preserve property, serve the general welfare, and secure peace. However, a problem arises from Hobbes’ standpoint: if societies thrive upon arbitrary authority, it is only insofar as beneficiaries are able and willing to abide by the law. But given that humans are naturally uncooperative in the Hobbesian worldview, societies must invent something that recognizes and is in turn recognized by the law: a “person.” As a result, humans, non-human entities, and corporations can be “personated.” Jurisprudence consequently grapples with criteria whereby persons are defined. While Hobbes is not the architect of the U.S. Constitution, his influence on the issue of personhood is most apparent when we ask, “who are the ‘we’ in ‘we the people?’” What counts as a person? No question is more urgent in the course of U.S. events than when personhood is defined by the Supreme Court. From Dred Scott v. Sandford to Brown v. Board of Education, from Roe v. Wade to Citizens United v. FEC, this course explores numerous landmark decisions that have made and unmade people.
We begin in the first unit by focusing on race and citizenship, asking questions about how personhood figures into the history of U.S. slavery and segregation. In the second unit, we move to Supreme Court decisions on the topics of gender and civil liberty.
Finally, in Unit Three we examine some of the most contentious cases within the Supreme Court’s purview in recent decades, highlighting a range of controversial topics, including abortion and Citizens United. While we will read scientific and sociological articles in addition to reading cases as a group, assignments in preparation for your independent Research Essay welcome various interdisciplinary approaches as opportunities to cultivate your own investments which, in turn, makes for better writing.
The Politics of Nostalgia
Sections 230, 231
In 1688, a Swiss medical student coined a new word to describe the painful symptoms suffered by people displaced from their native lands: “nostalgia.” Today, most of us have experienced this intense form of longing for places and times past. But what happens when this unattainable personal desire affects whole communities? What are the social, artistic, and political consequences of wanting to return to the past? And what does it mean to long for a time you never actually experienced? In this course, we will explore the enduring power of nostalgia not only as a lived experience, but also as a social phenomenon. In our first unit, we will closely examine nostalgic rhetoric in both presidential speeches and memoirs written by first- and second-generation immigrants (including Eva Hoffman and Audre Lorde). In our second unit, we will use the work of leading nostalgia theorists to interpret the representation of mid-century America in recent movies and television series, including Mad Men and Carol. Finally, in our third unit, students will make research a nostalgic artifact, practice, or movement of their own choosing. Possible topics include the aesthetics of Instagram, the music of Lana Del Rey, plantation weddings, or political movements that promise to restore the past.
Privacy and Surveillance
Sections 243, 244
Most of us are vaguely aware that our online activities are extensively monitored by corporations in search of profits and that the government may be watching or listening to our communications in the name of national security. It is easy to decry this state of affairs as Orwellian or, on the other hand, to reassure ourselves that surveillance only harms those with something to hide. In this course we will seek to move beyond these simplistic responses by considering the rights underlying privacy claims and by closely examining how surveillance operates in practice. We will begin by exploring the powerful, but surprisingly elusive, concept of privacy. Are we concerned only about the possibility that information gathered about us will be abused? Or is there something more fundamentally troubling in the government reading people's emails, or in corporations having records of our internet browsing histories? We will then consider government surveillance, specifically the National Security Agency’s power to monitor the content of calls and emails originating from non-American citizens who are outside the United States. Finally, we will examine what privacy rights we have with respect to private entities such as corporations, universities and charities.
Religious Pluralism in the United States
Note: This section is located in the Science and Engineering Complex (SEC) in Allston.
The United States is arguably the most religiously diverse nation in the world. Americans possess a dizzying array of religious beliefs and behavior. And despite predictions to the contrary, levels of devout religious belief remain high, evidenced by recent controversies over a proposed Islamic community center in Lower Manhattan, as well as Supreme Court rulings on female access to contraception and same-sex marriage. How do people—including nonbelievers—experience this religious multiplicity? How are these vast religious differences negotiated socially, culturally, politically, and legally? Moving beyond theology, this course will explore the broad concept of lived religion in the United States. Through readings in fiction, law, history, and sociology, we’ll tackle these fundamental issues. In Unit One, we’ll read Ayad Akhtar’s 2013 Pulitzer Prize-winning play, Disgraced, to explore how religion affects intimate relationships among spouses, friends, and co-workers. In the second unit, we’ll wade into the constitutional quandary surrounding the First Amendment, dissecting legal scholars’ arguments over the limits of religious freedom. Through a series of case studies involving snake handling, home schooling, and drug use, we’ll examine the frequent tension that emerges from a Bill of Rights that both guarantees the free exercise of religion and requires some degree of secularism. Finally, in Unit 3, students will focus on a religious topic of their choosing, design a research proposal, examine both primary and secondary sources, and write a substantial research paper.
Retelling Boston's History
This is an Engaged Scholarship Course.
The Cradle of Freedom, The City on a Hill, The Hub of the Universe: Even Boston’s nicknames point to its illustrious history, a history Boston has used to its advantage: over sixteen million tourists visit Massachusetts annually, driving an industry valued at over 10 billion dollars, and a huge part of that is historic tourism. Almost a quarter of them walk through Boston, doggedly following a narrow red line to experience that history: The Freedom Trail. Over 3 miles connecting 16 sites, the Freedom Trail tells the story of Boston history as historians of the 1940s and 1950s imagined it: triumphant, patriotic, and very narrow. It is a story that involves a couple hundred men, not the vibrant city of 12,000 men and women, over 1,000 of them enslaved Native Americans and Africans, who lived here in 1776.
For the past five years, and with new vigor since the summer of 2020, Americans have been forced to reckon with their history in new ways: what should be taught? Who should be venerated? As our interpretation and understanding of our history changes, how do we change its presentation? So far, most of the discussion around history and inclusivity has focused on removal—taking down statues, taking away names. But what if, instead of removing, we learned how to work with what we have: we can't tear up the red bricks–the Freedom Trail exists, and entices tourists every year. How do we instead use it?
This course, which by its nature will be only offered once, will first work with local nonprofit Boston By Foot, carrying out a careful review of their existing "Road to the Revolution" tour. Using the same tour-guiding principles as the National Parks System, you will travel out of the Yard and into Boston to examine the arguments made by buildings, tour guides, and the city itself. where the tour has opportunities for a broader history, and where there are themes that emphasize a "bottom up" approach to history. You will then present these findings to Boston by Foot’s Guide Committee. In the second half of the course you will make your own best effort at re-presenting this history. You will receive training as guides in order to learn how to assess the performance of public history. Finally, you will each research a site along the Freedom Trail, and working collaboratively as a class, create your own tour to be presented to the public on April 30.
Telling Her Story: Narrative, Media, and #MeToo
Sections 214, 215
In a powerful essay, the late writer and activist Audre Lorde suggested, “Where the words of women are crying to be heard we must each of us recognize our responsibility to seek those words out, to read them and share them and examine them in their pertinence to our lives.” Lorde is not alone in asking us to pay attention to and take responsibility for women’s stories; for centuries scholars and activists alike have championed the words of women, including women of color and queer women, whose stories have routinely gone untold or unheard. Yet if this issue has always been pressing, the call to heed women’s stories seems especially urgent at a moment when such stories have come to dominate the cultural landscape and public consciousness – from news accounts to popular shows, literature to social media. This course responds to this moment by examining how women’s stories are narrated across a variety of media and exploring what impact the sharing of them can have. Our first unit focuses on short stories by contemporary authors Roxane Gay, Carmen Maria Machado, and Jenny Zhang that raise questions about the body, family, love, and intersectionality. Our second unit engages visual and performance art alongside “hashtag activism” movements like #MeToo and #SayHerName. We’ll probe the relationship between art and activism, considering how - and whether - art and social media can achieve what Sarah Lewis has termed “representational justice.” Students develop independent research papers surrounding these topics. The semester ends with a capstone project that asks students to “curate” an online, public-facing exhibit related to their research.
Truth Claims in a Post-Truth World
We often describe an idea or phrase as having “the ring of truth,” but what does truth sound like? And what happens when politicians, news organizations, and advertising agencies learn to reproduce or mimic that sound? This course addresses recent claims that we are living in a “post-truth world,” and considers the fate of argument in a world in which truth is subjective, and fact divided into mainstream and alternative forms. Is it possible to draw clear lines between fact and fiction, truth and lies? In Unit 1, we’ll consider the methods we use to distinguish fact from fiction, truth from lies, as we examine fictional texts that blur these lines, philosophical texts that seek to define them, and non-fictional texts that explore the real-world stakes of these distinctions. In Unit 2, we'll focus on subjective truths (or truths that differ for each individual) and examine the challenges these truths pose. We’ll also explore podcasts, social media platforms, and interviews to explore how the internet has shaped our relationship to truth and argument. Unit 3 will take us where the quest for truth reaches its extremes: the conspiracy theory. We’ll look at the complex anatomy of conspiracy, and students will have an opportunity to design original research projects that fit their interests.
Section 239, 240
Why I Love Teaching This Course
I’m fascinated by the topic of hell because it provides us with a vivid dramatization of and way of thinking about our fear of death. But I’m also fascinated with it because it sparks conversations about suffering, empathy, justice, and punishment. The idea that certain people deserve to be punished forever is an appealing one to human beings, especially when we are confronted with others who have committed terrible acts. But it’s an idea that’s troubling and has always been challenged. Even some major Christian theologians (e.g. Origen) thought that the damned should eventually get to leave hell behind, and Christian writers like Dante were, in spite of themselves, compelled to pity the damned. This issue then leads into contemporary secular debates about whether there are cases in which people should be blackballed from society or put in prison for life (a version of hell), or whether rehabilitation should be the goal.
Hell also often produces empathy for the people who suffer there – just as it did for Dante. And as theorist Rachel Falconer points out, in modern times, when people who are suffering – from mental illness, from homelessness, from cancer or from any other grievous problem – say they are ‘in hell,’ they don’t mean that they think they deserve to be there. Rather, they’re simply trying to find language that’s up to the task of expressing how much pain they are in. Hence, as we’ll discuss, though hell is in and of itself a concept full of violence and terror, in modern secular culture it often becomes a means of accessing empathy – of giving us the tools to do a slightly better job of imagining how much other people suffer, and in this way, strangely, the concept of hell becomes deeply humane.
There are many other things I find fascinating about this subject. I love how flexible the concept of hell is and how many different imaginative forms, genres, and mediums it turns up in from poetry, novels, films, and paintings, to science fiction, TV, heavy metal, musicals, music videos, comic books, and videogames. Hell texts then provide the opportunity to practice thinking as seriously about popular media as one might do about art or literary texts. I also value how the idea of hell gives us an opportunity to see how imagination need not be a means of escapism, but can actually be a means of facing the real world more fully. Along those lines, for the final paper in this class, students pick a vivid imagining of hell in a contemporary text, and then demonstrate how hell in that text is a metaphor for and means of grappling with a particular real-world problem (like global warming or corrupt law firms).
The Uses of Horror
Section 258, 259
In a conversation with Stephen Colbert, comedian and filmmaker Jordan Peele referred to his 2017 horror film, Get Out, as a “historical biopic.” His claim that “the movie is truth” invites us to reflect on the relationship between horror and history – between fictional and filmic fantasies that terrify us and our own lived realities. In this course, we’ll think about what makes horror cohere as a genre, how its aesthetic qualities operate on the mind of the observer or reader, and what kinds of social and cultural commentary might we discover in a genre that’s often been dismissed as frivolous. The readings for this course – and our responses to them – will help us think through some key questions: How do we explain our cultural preoccupation with the macabre? How might our engagement with terrifying works of the imagination help us think in new ways about the world in which we live? While these questions are relevant to (and potentially answered within) a range of disciplines – from sociology to psychology to neuroscience, and beyond – our primary sources in this course will be works of fiction and film.
In our first unit, we’ll read a range of short stories (by Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Joyce Carol Oates, Carmen Maria Machado, Mariana Enriquez, and others), paying particular attention to how they express anxieties about the unknown and the irrational and how they serve as allegories for psychic and social realities. We’ll also think about how the 20th- and 21st-century authors riff on and subvert the conventions of their 19th-century predecessors. In the second unit, we’ll examine the role that paranoia plays in the horror genre by way of another classic-contemporary pairing: Henry James’s novella The Turn of the Screw and Peele’s Get Out. We’ll read several theoretical sources that will help you think (and write) about how novella and film operate as allegories. For the third unit, you’ll have the opportunity to write a research paper about a primary source (or sources) of your choice: horror film, Gothic novel, short story, etc. Our shared sources for the unit will provide a broader sense of the genre and some of its key questions and concerns. These sources will serve as springboards for your independent research.
The impenetrable wilderness of The Revenant, the diseased streets of Children of Men, the trash heap cities of Wall-E—these are the wastelands that fascinate our pop culture. On the screen, they come to life as horrifying alternate universes and dead civilizations—the very fates we must avoid at all costs. And yet wastelands are not exclusively the stuff of science fiction. In this course, we will grapple with both imaginary and actual wastelands. We will begin with short stories by Jack London, Thomas King, and Octavia Butler. From the icy wilds of the Yukon to the borderlands of Native American exile, these writers question the way wastelands have been imagined, especially in North America, over the past century. Next, we will turn to real wastelands—to the garbage dumps and arid landscapes where nothing grows. We will ask what these places reveal about their inhabitants, their struggles, and their achievements. Finally, students will research a wasteland of their own choosing—anything from the mega slums of Mumbai to the sprawl of Boston's unused rooftops. Along the way, we will investigate how wastelands form and evolve, and how people adapt to them. Are wastelands actually the places we should avoid at all costs, or are they the places we can no longer afford to ignore?
What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Climate Change?
Sections 216, 217
This class will explore how to write, think, and talk about the complexities of global climate change. We are living in a moment where the reality of massive, human-made global climate change has become unavoidable. In the face of our changing plane--the loss of ordinary seasons, bugs, expected weather, known landmarks--language can seem hard to find. While fires burn in California and coastlines disappear, artists, politicians, business owners, and citizens seem to still be casting about for a way to comprehend and talk about the changes that are already taking place, and the ones that are coming. How can we write about a world in flux? How does the effect of environmental disaster change depending on our class, or race, or gender, or location? How do we create narratives about environmental loss?
In unit one, we will investigate how different experts describe the current effects of the climate crisis. We will read the newest IPCC report on the climate crisis, and use it to analyze a series of green or eco advertisements in light of this scientific and international understanding of the crisis. In the second unit, we will turn to competing stories about the origins of the climate crisis. Some scientists and historians claim that the Anthropocene, a name for this geological era of human-made change, begins with the start of agriculture or the beginning of the nuclear age; others place the beginning in the rise of the plantation system in the Americas. Reading poetry by Tommy Pico, fiction by Karen Tai Yamashita, and watching the film Daughters of the Dust, alongside selections from the scientific journal Nature and excerpts from work by ecofeminist Donna Haraway, we will compare how each starting point tells a different story about the cause, and the continuing effects, of climate change. In unit three, we will turn to the future, asking why so many of our climate crisis narratives imagine the end of the world and asking what it means to imagine the future in the moment of crisis. Final research papers will evaluate visions of the future, with such examples as seed-saving projects, Octavia Butler’s novel The Parable of the Sower, the student-lead climate change movement “Fridays for the Future,” and the Green New Deal.
Work: Culture, Power, and Control
This course explores the structure and experience of work in the contemporary political economy with an eye toward both its liberating and oppressive potential. We will take up enduring sociological questions with respect to power, control, autonomy, surveillance and self-determination on the job. How do different forms of work affect our life circumstances, personalities, and connections to each other? In the first unit we will examine corporate culture and how it affects the experience of professional work. Does a strong corporate culture enhance professional autonomy or management’s power? Does it facilitate or undermine community? In unit two we explore the crucial issue of workers’ control over their own labor and the concept of alienation. We examine accounts of deskilling, the separation of mental and manual labor, and the consequences of these processes for workers’ experience on the job. To what extent does alienation occur in offices versus factories versus service counters? For the final unit we will critically engage in a debate about the development of “flexible” labor and the ways in which workers’ connections to employers, occupations, and locations have become more fluid and transitory. We will explore what flexibility means in a variety of contexts and ask: does flexibility lead to liberation or loss of identity? Does it bring self-fulfillment or insecurity? What does flexibility mean for tech workers in Silicon Valley, bankers on Wall Street, and gig workers? Our texts consist of case studies and ethnographic accounts representing a variety of workplaces along with readings from prominent social theorists who in different ways seek to elucidate the conditions of work under modern capitalism.